Letter From Prof. Chas. Anthon Re: Golden Plate Writing Samples

Letter From Prof. Chas. Anthon Re: Golden Plate Writing Samples

[  The following letter, written by Professor Charles Anthon, was published in E. D. Howe’s Book entitled Mormonism Unvailed, (Painesville, OH:: E.D.Howe, 1834), pp. 270-272.  Dr. Anthon’s statement should be compared to the “official” LDS version of the story (and Joseph Smith’s early version of the story) told in Pearl of Great Price, Joseph Smith – History 1:63-65.  The LDS Pearl of Great Price refers to Dr. Anthon as “a gentleman celebrated for his literary attainments,” (see Joseph Smith – History 1:64).  ] 


Dr. Charles Anthon re: Authenticity of Writing Samples Allegedly Copied from the Golden Plates


New York, Feb. 17, 1834.

     Dear Sir — I received this morning your favor of the 9th instant, and lose no time in making a reply.  The whole story about my having pronouncd (sic) the Mormonite inscription to be “reformed Egyptian hieroglyphics” is perfectly false.  Some years ago, a plain, and apparently simple-hearted farmer, called upon me with a note from Dr. Mitchell of our city, now deceased, requesting me to decypher (sic), if possible, a paper, which the farmer would hand me, and which Dr. M. confessed he had been unable to understand.  Upon examining the paper in question, I soon came to the conclusion that it was all a trick, perhaps a hoax.  When I asked the person, who brought it, how he obtained the writing, he gave me, as far as I can now recollect, the following account:  A “gold book,” consisting of a number of plates of gold, fastened together in the shape of a book by wires of the same metal, had been dug up in the northern part of the state of New York, and along with the book an enormous pair of “gold spectacles“!  These spectacles were so large, that, if a person attempted to look through them, his two eyes would have to be turned towards one of the glasses merely, the spectacles in question being altogether too large for the breadth of the human face.  Whoever examined the plates through the spectacles, was enabled not only to read them, but fully to understand their meaning.  All this knowledge, however, was confined at that time to a young man, who had the trunk containing the book and spectacles in his sole possession.  This young man was placed behind a curtain, in the garret of a farm house, and being thus concealed from view, put on the spectacles occasionally, or rather, looked through one of the glasses, decyphered (sic) the characters in the book, and, having committed some of them to paper, handed copies from behind the curtain, to those who stood on the outside.  Not a word, however, was said about the plates having been decyphered (sic) “by the gift of God.”  Everything, in this way, was effected by the large pair of spectacles.  The farmer added, that he had been requested to contribute a sum of money towards the publication of the “golden book,” the contents of which would, as he had been assured, produce an entire change in the world and save it from ruin.  So urgent had been these solicitations, that he intended selling his farm and handing over the amount received to those who wished to publish the plates.  As a last precautionary step, however, he had resolved to come to New York, and obtain the opinion of the learned about the meaning of the paper which he brought with him, and which had been given him as a part of the contents of the book, although no translation had been furnished at the time by the young man with the spectacles.  On hearing this odd story, I changed my opinion about the paper, and, instead of viewing it any longer as a hoax upon the learned, I began to regard it as part of a scheme to cheat the farmer of his money, and I communicated my suspicions to him, warning him to beware of rogues.  He requested an opinion from me in writing, which of course I declined giving, and he then took his leave carrying the paper with him.  This paper was in fact a singular scrawl.  It consisted of all kinds of crooked characters disposed in columns, and had evidently been prepared by some person who had before him at the time a book containing various alphabets.  Greek and Hebrew letters, crosses and flourishes, Roman letters inverted or placed sideways, were arranged in perpendicular columns, and the whole ended in a rude delineation of a circle divided into various compartments, decked with various strange marks, and evidently copied after the Mexican Calender given by Humboldt, but copied in such a way as not to betray the source whence it was derived.  I am thus particular as to the contents of the paper, inasmuch as I have frequently conversed with my friends of the subject, since the Mormonite excitement began, and well remember that the paper contained any thing else but “Egyptian Hieroglyphics.”  Some time after, the same farmer paid me a second visit.  He brought with him the golden book in print, and offered it to me for sale.  I declined purchasing.  He then asked permission to leave the book with me for examination.  I declined receiving it, although his manner was strangely urgent.  I adverted once more to the roguery which had been in my opinion practised upon him, and asked him what had become of the gold plates.  He informed me that they were in a trunk with the large pair of spectacles.  I advised him to go to a magistrate and have the trunk examined.  He said the “curse of God” would come upon him should he do this.  On my pressing him, however, to pursue the course which I had recommended, he told me that he would open the trunk, if I would take the “curse of God” upon myself.  I replied that I would do so with the greatest willingness, and would incur every risk of that nature, provided I could only extricate him from the grasp of rogues.  He then left me.

     I have thus given you a full statement of all that I know respecting the origin of Mormonism, and must beg you, as a personal favor, to publish this letter immediately, should you find my name mentioned again by these wretched fanatics.  Yours respectfully,   . . . . . CHAS. ANTHON.